Sunday, May 30, 2010
Transfer of Data from AR website
Cycle 1 Data Analysis
Action Research Project: Develop a strategy to help struggling readers to understand main idea.
Cycle 1- Data Analysis
Data: Throughout Cycle 1, I tested the students weekly on reading comprehension, kept running records, continued to research this topic, analyzed daily writing and reading assignments and utilized student surveys to determine growth in the area of main idea.
I compared test scores from before we initiated Cycle 1 to after the completion of Cycle 1. I have analyzed their writing skills and grammar development as well as each student has been keeping a writing portfolio.
Each student had created a wooden avatar and written a story about the avatar. I tested the students on their own stories with reading comprehension questions including Main Idea, which is what this project is about. Each passed with high scores.
Insight
What I discovered from my data was that students must have some background knowledge in order to understand main idea. The majority of these students have no background knowledge of what their reading text, science and social studies texts are presenting; therefore, students must create their own background knowledge.
Surprises
What I was disappointed with was the fact that not all twenty-one students were on target for completion of Cycle 1 and I had to revise my approach in order to complete it close to the scheduled date.
One major surprise was that the students who range in age from 8-12, had no idea of how to hold a paint brush, dip the paint or mix colors. Another major surprise was that the majority of these students were not familiar with over 20 fairy tales that I named when they were trying to decide what they wanted their avatar to be.
Reaction From Critical Friends
This is a reaction from one of my critical friends: Kerry Marquis
This is from my principal: Angela Hutchinson
This is from Coach Webb:
This comment from Jan Rutherford:
As stated above, I was very pleased with the outcome of the eleven students who completed the Cycle. Even those students who did not complete on time, 60% had overall improvement in each category of reading assessment.
Critical friends have been very supportive of my research and project strategies.
Where do I go from here? What are my next steps? Was it relevant?
Because of the delay in completion of Cycle 1, I had to adjust the start of Cycle 2 by a couple of weeks and because of FCAT testing schedules.
Another small glitch is a change in our curriculum schedule which I did not anticipate. Therefore the students cannot resume their task until after FCAT which will delay my cycle completion by about three weeks.
I realize I will have to tweak Cycle 2 a bit, based upon the fact that only half of the students completed the entire first cycle on time. Instruction in painting which took a week or so, delayed us a little.
I think this is a worthwhile endeavor and I plan to continue with the method I have envisioned. I had to make a few minor adjustments; however, all is well.
Saturday, May 29, 2010
Summary of Results
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
My Action Research Project was to develop a strategy to help struggling readers to understand the main idea in a reading selection. I chose students from my fourth grade class which is housed in a Title 1 school, to participate in my Action Research Project.
I chose this topic for my research project because I have observed students in Title 1 schools in particular, having more difficulty with reading comprehension, especially understanding main idea.
The study began as Cycle 1 in October 2009 with pre-testing utilizing three formal assessments to determine the percentage of understanding of main idea. The results of the initial assessment were that 7 students scored 75% or higher on main idea.
The strategy consisted of the students choosing an avatar to create a character for a story. They were given a plain wooden doll to create their avatar. It could be a mythical character, an imaginary friend, an idol or a career figure. The students painted the avatar in the manner of the character they selected.
Next, students were instructed to write a story with their avatar as the main character. Meanwhile, they were to play with the avatar each time they wrote a passage. I assisted them only by editing their stories for grammar and other writing conventions. I did not make any suggestions as to how it was written or what the context would be. They revised and edited several times before their stories were complete.
Cycle 1 ended in January 2010 with only 11 of the 22 students completing the total writing.
At the end of Cycle 1, all students were again tested with three formative tests, running records that had been kept since October as well as weekly comprehension tests.
The data at the end of Cycle 1 revealed that 11 students out of 22 scored 75% or higher on main idea.
I discovered that some of the students were not motivated enough to complete the writing of their stories at the beginning of Cycle 2. Prior, the students could play with the avatars and paint and write together. Eleven of the students had not completed painting the avatars so I took them away and instructed the 11 that they could not paint until the stories were completed. This was the motivation they needed because the first 11 who completed were now scripting their stories for a digital movie. The first 11 students completed their movies with animation and music about two weeks ahead of schedule. By the end of Cycle 2, all students had completed the project in its entirety.
At the conclusion of Cycle 2, students were again administered the three formal assessments to determine understanding of main idea. The results were outstanding.
Students were also tested on their own stories. There was a 100% pass rate on their stories. The results of the three formal tests showed that 18 out of 22 students scored 75% or higher on main idea. This is an 18% gain from the beginning of Cycle 1 to the end of Cycle 2, utilizing unfamiliar reading passages. I also recorded data for students reading familiar passages and that was a phenomenal 43% increase in understanding main idea.
My research demonstrated what I had discovered during the review of literature;
that, it is crucial for students to have prior knowledge of a topic to more fully understand the main idea. Stevens’ (1998) research demonstrated an increase in understanding main idea better even though prior knowledge was taught about a different topic than one being tested on.
The key for students to understand the main idea is becoming knowledgeable about the character or subject being discussed; the important aspect surrounding the character or subject. Once the student has been exposed to learning about or constructing his own main idea, then the student can have a better understanding because they have created “prior” knowledge.
The following chart is an example of where my students were in understanding main idea a year ago:
This is actual FCAT data. The third grade is representative of my students because I looped to fourth grade with them this year. This data also correlates with actual data for my 22 students, which data was the same for the entire third grade; 63%. I will not have FCAT data to compare this year to last year until June 7-11, 2010; however, I do
have FAIR, DAR and HARCOURT as well as SME, running records and weekly scores. My students’ data is off the charts! Hopefully, when I do have 2010 FCAT scores, it will render the same results.
My critical friends have been very supportive throughout this process offering words of encouragement, suggestions and advice. I am grateful to all of them.
I am hoping to loop to fifth grade with my students so that I can continue this study further. Now that my students have the concept mastered, they don’t need the avatar, they do need to continue to write and apply critical thinking skills to analyze each passage that they read to determine the facts pertaining to the main idea.
What I hope to further accomplish is sharing this concept by way of publishing my findings and sharing this strategy with colleagues worldwide.
It is my belief that this strategy will demonstrate the need for helping students to build upon background knowledge before attempting to understand material for which they have no knowledge. With this concept in place, it will be easier for students to grasp the key to understanding main idea.
Publishing Leadership Project
http://issuu.com/isabellarose/docs/research-based_reading_strategy
Publishing Leadership Project
Develop and Implement a Strategy to Assist Struggling Readers
to Comprehend the Main Idea in a Reading Selection: A
Synthesis of the Research
Patricia Marcino
Full Sail University
One of the problems facing struggling readers is that the students do not have adequate background knowledge, which hinders them from grasping the main idea of the text they are reading. In essence, when students read stories about things in respect for which they lack knowledge, they will not be able to grasp the main idea, unless they have some background information on the main theme of the story. Although there are abundant resources available on the problems relating to struggling readers, there has not been enough past research conducted focusing on the reading ability of students of Title 1 schools and their grasp of the main idea. There are studies concentrating on the problems of students with disabilities and learning disabilities, and those specifically targeting low socioeconomic students and reading comprehension.
Reading comprehension is a multifaceted process ranging from simple recall of sight words to mastery of plays and the ability to analyze text implications. Factors such as IQ,
home environment, instructional methods, motivation and brain synthesis all play a role in
comprehension.
FCAT Statistics
According to research utilizing a five-year study of the Florida Comprehension Assessment Test (FCAT), students in grades 3-5 from the Title 1 population typically score less on the Main Idea section of the test. The average attainment is 57%, which is well below the acceptable passing percentage of 65% which when correlated to a grade, would be a “D.” Over the five-year period, third graders’ average attainment was 53%, fourth grade 56%, and fifth grade was 56%. In order to change this trend, students must be exposed to a strategy that will aid them in understanding the main idea.
The following chart depicts the FCAT Reading Comprehension attainment for the school in which this study was conducted.
FCAT Reading Summary- Patterson Elementary School
Reading Ability and Text Comprehension
Kinder and Bursuck (1991) report that many textbooks are poorly written, thereby
not clarifying the relationship between concepts, ideas and sentences. They fail to use precise language or text structure to relate content to main idea.
Dickson, Simmons and Kameenui (2009) also note that academic texts often are not well written or constructed and that textbooks, in particular, do not necessarily follow the conventions for a well-presented text. For example, the main idea of a paragraph may be stated late in the paragraph or be missing all together. Dickson et al. (1995a, 1995b) note that, in this case, students will likely need to invent a main idea if necessary. Further, students need to experience teacher modeling, explicit teaching, and practice in order to successfully identify the structures and features of increasingly complex texts in the different content areas.
According to Rothman (2003), the nature of the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and student achievement has been debated for decades. Rothman (2003) cites the works of Coleman (1966) and Jencks, et al. (1973) for many influential arguments in this connection pertaining to the context of United States of America. There are other studies conducted in the Australian setting, which focus on the influence of socioeconomic status on student achievement (Commission of Inquiry into Poverty, 1976; Karmel, 1973). Rothman (2003) argues that there are no clear evidences to prove the influence of SES on student achievement, as there are a number of theoretical frameworks developed to explain the relationship. The views of Rothman (2003) are more in alignment with the proposed theories of the current research, which postulates the low socioeconomic students are lacking in an academic home environment. Additionally, their neighborhood environment has a profound effect on these students’ academic achievements.
The research by Rothman (2003) covered the period from 1980 to 2003 to assess the influence of SES on student performance in Australia. Studies were conducted on the reading abilities of students by removing them from low socioeconomic influences and placing in middle to high middle class environments. Determination of the influence of SES on the academic development and achievement of the students shifted to a new economic environment was the central focus of the study. Lower test scores were recorded and reported for low socioeconomic class students than for middle and upper middle class students. The study also found that parental occupation and environment had a definite impact on students’ academic achievements.
Importance of Background Knowledge
Burns, Roe & Smith (2001) state the product of the reading act is the communication of thoughts and emotions by the writer to the reader, resulting in the reader’s own understanding of ideas that the writer has put into print. Communication results from the reader’s construction of meaning through integrating his or her prior knowledge with the information presented in text.
Research on enriching background knowledge has demonstrated that activating such knowledge increases comprehension. Graves and his associates (1980,1983) developed previews for short stories that had as one component the building of prior knowledge important to understanding the selection. Data indicated that reading the previews before reading the stories increased the students’ learning from stories by a significant and impressive amount. Stevens (1982) conducted a study to determine whether or not direct teaching of background knowledge on the topic of instruction would benefit students when reading passages on that topic. The research was conducted with tenth grade high school boys wherein the boys were randomly assigned to one of two conditions, pre-reading instruction related to the reading topic, and non-relevant instruction on another topic. The author concluded that instruction prior to reading on text-related information improves student reading comprehension. Alvarez (1990) used case-based instruction to develop students’ abilities to assemble and incorporate different knowledge sources in memory. He taught them how to employ thematic organizers and hierarchical concept mapping in their reading.
Lipson (1982) examined twenty-eight third graders, half considered below average and the other half considered average in reading based on standardized achievement tests scores. An intervention, in which types of explicit versus inferential information, was tested to evaluate student acquisition of new information. The reported findings include: (a) prior knowledge was a great factor in reading comprehension for both groups, (b) acquiring new information was higher than correcting old inaccurate information, and (c) all readers resorted to using text to find information, only if prior knowledge was weak.
Teaching students from low socioeconomic background with poorly written textbooks will only lead to the creation of more struggling readers. Richard Vacca, states, “Being a good reader is crucial to today’s adolescents, who will need to read and write more than adults have at any other time in human history” (page 51). One of the objectives of NCLB (No Child Left Behind) Act is to help those students, who are struggling readers. However, there are many avenues to be pursued in this direction. Nell K Duke is of the view that a picture is worth a thousand words when it comes to comprehension. Gardner (1999) states that about 35% of the population are visual learners.
Title 1 Struggling Readers
Following in depth research, Title 1 students participated in a 6-month study to determine the effectiveness of a strategy, which would help them to understand the main idea. Given that the majority of Title 1 students have little to no experience in schema theory, which is relating text–to-self, text-to-text and text-to-world, a strategy was developed that would assist students in making connections which is necessary for reading comprehension.
Prior to the application of the strategy, the students were tested on reading comprehension with data collected from three independent formal testing formats, surveys, a series of questions after reading passages and story retelling. These scores were analyzed and the data recorded as follows:
Of the 22 students tested, 7 students scored 75% or higher in the area of main idea in a compilation of the
data.
Implementation of the Strategy-Cycle 1
At the beginning of Cycle One of the strategy, students were introduced to the idea of creating an avatar of him or herself or an imaginary character. The avatars were plain wooden dolls. After deciding on a character, the students painted the avatars.
Painting the avatars proved to be a little more undertaking than was previously thought. Several of the students did not know how to properly dip the brush or mix the paints. Additionally, some students changed their minds two to three times before deciding on a character. Many were not familiar with more than one or
two fairy tales.
t
Students were encouraged to play with the avatars, becoming totally engrossed in the characterization of the avatar.
Next, students were instructed to write a story with their avatar as the main character. Meanwhile, they were to play with the avatar each time they wrote a passage. The idea being
if the student could write about something he/she was familiar with; the student could create background knowledge, which is formidable in reading comprehension.
Making connections is a great informal assessment strategy that is generally used by teachers to help students make connections as they are reading; however, if students have little to no background knowledge to make connections to, then a different strategy must be put in place to assist students in establishing a relationship from themselves to text content.
The only assistance students received, as far as their story creation, was general conventions editing.
Following the initial edit, the students revised and edited their stories according to the rubric.
At the end of Cycle 1, all students were again tested with three formative tests, running records that had been kept since October as well as weekly comprehension tests.
After compilation of the data, of the 22 students participating, 11 students scored 75% or
higher in the area of main idea with a score of 85% or higher on their own story.
Second phase-Cycle Two
Cycle Two proved to be a very interesting undertaking as well. Even though many of the students had been exposed to computers by way of testing, gaming and research for library topics, they had not been instructed in the art of movie making. This phase was truly a literacy transformation. Not only did the students script their stories for a movie, they narrated the movie, selected music and animation. It was a great learning experience for all of them. The joy expressed in the students’ faces was a sight to behold. These struggling readers had not only written a story but also produced a movie from their stories and recorded a DVD, which was shared with friends and family.
Results of the Study
Not only was this a successful strategy to assist these struggling readers to understand the main idea, but it was also a confidence booster. Students had mastered a technique to bridge the gap from being a struggling reader to proficiently reading and comprehending text.
Students were able to establish a knowledge base, from which to make a connection to a story and understand the main idea. Additionally, students saw their story come to life by way of creating a digital story.
At the end of Cycle Two, Post- testing was administered under the same premise as at the beginning of the project. Results were outstanding.
Post compilation of identical instrumentation produced 18 out of 22 students scored 75% or higher in reading comprehension; main idea. The data yielded 100% on main idea when tested on the stories the students had written.
Based on formative data from three sources, summative data which was on-going weekly and a compilation of academic grades, overall there has been an average of an 18% increase in students understanding main idea from an unfamiliar reading selection. If the students’ self-created story for background knowledge is considered, then the rate is even higher at a 43% increase!
Conclusion:
The data speaks for itself. It has been conclusively proven that a strategy, which allows students to create stories they can relate to by forming their own background knowledge effectively, impacts understanding of the main idea in unfamiliar stories for which they have no background knowledge. The students were able to analyze the main character’s involvement in the reading selections and or ascertain what facts were being presented that describe the main idea; thereby, substantiating what research has revealed; background knowledge is essential to understanding the main idea.
References
Alvarez, M. (1990). Knowledge activation and schema construction. Paper presented at
the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association: Boston, MA
April 16-20, 1990.
Bay District Schools: AYP data charts
Burns, P., Roe, B., & Smith, S. (2002). Teaching reading in today’s elementary schools.
New York, NY: Houghton-Mifflin Company
Coleman, J., (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC:
Government Printing Office.
Dickson, S. V., Simmons, D. C., & Kameenui, E. J. (1995a). Text organization and its
relation to reading comprehension: A synthesis of the research. Technical Report No.
17. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon, National Center to Improve the Tools of
Educators. Retrieved March 1, 2010 from:
http://idea.uoregon.edu/~ncite/documents/techrep/tech17.html
Dickson, S. V., Simmons, D. C., & Kameenui, E. J. (1995b). Text organization: Curricular
and instructional implications for diverse learners. Technical Report No. 18. Eugene,
OR: University of Oregon, National Center to Improve the Tools of Educators.
Retrieved March 1, 2010, from
http://idea.uoregon.edu/~ncite/documents/techrep/tech18.html
Florida Department of Education: FCAT data charts
Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed. New York, NY: Basic.
Graves, M., et al. (1983). Effects of previewing difficult short stores on low ability
junior high school students’ comprehension recall and attitudes. Reading Research
Quarterly 18 (3) Spring 183, 262-76. EJ 279 344
Jencks, C., Smith, M., Acland, H., Bane, M., Cohen, D., Gintis, H., Heyns, B., &
Michelson, S. (1972). Inequality: A reassessment of the effect of family and
schooling in America. New York: Basic.
Kameenui, E., Simmons, D. (2009). What reading research tells us about children
with diverse learning needs: Bases and basics (The Lea series on special
education and disability). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, Associates.
Karmel, P. (chair) (1985) Quality of education in Australia. Report of the Review
Committee. Canberra: AGPS.
Kinder, D., & Bursuck, W. (1991). The search for a unified social studies curriculum:
Does history repeat itself? Journal of Learning Disabilities. 24, 270-275.
Lipson, M. (1982). Learning new information from text: the role of prior knowledge
and reading ability. Journal of Reading Behavior, 14, 243-261.
Rothman, S. (2003). The changing influence of socioeconomic status on student
achievement: recent evidence from Australia: Australian Council for
Educational Research, Melbourne, Australia.
Stevens, K. (1982). Can we improve reading by teaching background information?
Journal of Reading, January 326-329.
Vacca, R. (1998). Content area reading: literacy and learning across the curriculum.
Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
